Updates on the Bush Administration's environmental record, delivered straight to your inbox.
Privacy policy

December 18, 2006
EPA Exempts Pesticides from Clean Water Act

November 17, 2006
EPA’s New Air Quality Standards Endanger Public Health

November 02, 2006
Bush Names Exxon Chief to Chart America’s Energy Future

See Articles By Category

Enter keyword(s) to search through back issues:

Mother Jones Feature
In the most recent issue of Mother Jones the growing consequences of pollution and environmental toxins for the region are highlighted in Dozens of Words for Snow, None for Pollution by Marla Cone. The article is free of charge to readers of BushGreenwatch.org.
 
Exxpose Exxon
A coalition of environmental and public interest groups spotlighting ExxonMobil’s efforts to drill in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, prevent action on global warming, and encourage America’s oil dependence.
 
Gristmill
Grist Magazine's new blog is the place for continuous commentary from a stable of smarty-pants writers the likes of which the environmental world has never seen.
 
REP America
View the website for the "environmental conscience of the GOP." This site includes the Campaign for Change: Action Plan for a Green GOP Century.
 
Environmental Health News
Sign up to receive daily news summaries of environmental health coverage from around the world, in your inbox by 9 am ET.


>E-mail this story
>Print this page
>Send BushGreenwatch to a friend

March 15, 2004 | Back Issues « previous | next »
Bush EPA Seeks Weaker Control Over Transport of Hazardous Waste

The Bush Administration is on the verge of approving new transportation regulations (TSR-1) that would exempt various levels of radioactive material from regulatory control while in transit. Public comment on EPA's controversial reclassification proposal closes this Wednesday, March 17.[1]

EPA has also joined the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), Departments of Energy and Transportation in seeking to redefine radioactive materials, including nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and naturally occurring materials (see last Friday's March 12 BushGreenwatch).

The new class of material, categorized as Below Regulatory Concern, would not be subject to radioactive regulatory controls. Exempting radionuclides from regulation, labeling or control during transit will also make it easier for the EPA and NRC to deregulate hazardous nuclear waste.[2]

Allowing an increase of unregulated nuclear material on the nation's roads, rails, barges and aircraft is of special concern due to homeland security worries over the transportation of nuclear material possibly enabling a dirty bomb.[3]

"Everyone recognizes this as a very serious threat. The last thing we need is to make this easier," Rick Hind, toxics director at Greenpeace, told BushGreenwatch. "This is yet another example of inadequate public health protection in favor of sweetheart deals for industry."

A major study also found that transportation-related accidents have the potential to cause greater numbers of deaths, injuries and possible large-scale evacuations.[4]

"Radioactive waste is extremely dangerous stuff, probably the most dangerous material that can be shipped," said Fred Millar, former toxics director at Friends of the Earth. "Even a tiny release could be catastrophic in an urban area."

###

TAKE ACTION
The deadline for comments is March 17th, so act quickly and spread the word. Email EPA and let them know you oppose federal rules that would deregulate and exempt nuclear materials from regulation. Send a copy of your comment to EPA Administrator Mike Leavitt.

###

SOURCES:
[1] Diane D'Arrigo, Nuclear Information and Resource Service, dianed@nirs.org.
[2] Ibid.
[3] Ibid.
[4] A National Risk Assessment for Selected Hazardous Materials Transportation, Dec. 2000.





E-mail this story | Print this page | Send BushGreenwatch to a friend