Updates on the Bush Administration's environmental record, delivered straight to your inbox.
Privacy policy

December 18, 2006
EPA Exempts Pesticides from Clean Water Act

November 17, 2006
EPA’s New Air Quality Standards Endanger Public Health

November 02, 2006
Bush Names Exxon Chief to Chart America’s Energy Future

See Articles By Category

Enter keyword(s) to search through back issues:

Mother Jones Feature
In the most recent issue of Mother Jones the growing consequences of pollution and environmental toxins for the region are highlighted in Dozens of Words for Snow, None for Pollution by Marla Cone. The article is free of charge to readers of BushGreenwatch.org.
 
Exxpose Exxon
A coalition of environmental and public interest groups spotlighting ExxonMobil’s efforts to drill in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, prevent action on global warming, and encourage America’s oil dependence.
 
Gristmill
Grist Magazine's new blog is the place for continuous commentary from a stable of smarty-pants writers the likes of which the environmental world has never seen.
 
REP America
View the website for the "environmental conscience of the GOP." This site includes the Campaign for Change: Action Plan for a Green GOP Century.
 
Environmental Health News
Sign up to receive daily news summaries of environmental health coverage from around the world, in your inbox by 9 am ET.


>E-mail this story
>Print this page
>Send BushGreenwatch to a friend

September 29, 2004 | Back Issues « previous | next »
Energy Efficiency Delays by Bush Administration Costing Consumers Billions

President Bush's energy plan calls for aggressively drilling oil
and gas in pristine wilderness areas in the West and Alaska, as
well as construction of hundreds of new power plants across the
country. Many would be coal-fired plants, which contribute to
global warming and cause air pollution and acid rain.

But if the President simply accelerated new efficiency standards
for furnaces and boilers, commercial air conditioners and
transformers, this oil and gas drilling would be unnecessary,
according to a new report by three energy watchdog groups.

Under President Bush, the Department of Energy (DOE) has dragged
its feet for years on new energy standards, even though each
year's delay costs consumers and businesses over $7 billion in
higher energy costs over the lifetimes of the inefficient
equipment sold. Electricity savings each year would be enough to
power 330,000 U.S. homes. Natural gas savings could heat about
170,000 homes.

"Enormous energy savings are at stake," said Steve Nadel,
executive director of the American Council for an Energy
Efficient Economy
(ACEEE). "Strong standards for these three
products could slash U.S. electricity demand by about 22,000
megawatts, eliminating the need for as many as 70 new power
plants."

The Department of Energy named new standards for residential
furnaces and boilers, commercial air conditioners, and
distribution transformers as "high priorities" in 2001, but only
last month were initial proposals finally issued. Under DOE's
timetable, a final rule will not go into effect until 2009.

"With yet another winter of sky-high heating bills around the
corner, it's a horrible time for DOE to walk away from its
responsibility for establishing common-sense furnace efficiency
standards," said Nadel.

In addition to being years behind on the current rulemakings,
DOE has missed legal deadlines for another dozen products. The
ACEEE report includes an appendix with state-by-state estimates
of the impact new standards would have on energy use, energy
bills, and the environment.

"Powerful Priorities: Updating Energy Efficiency Standards for
Residential Furnaces, Commercial Air Conditioners, and
Distribution Transformers" can be downloaded at
www.standardsASAP.org.

###





E-mail this story | Print this page | Send BushGreenwatch to a friend