Updates on the Bush Administration's environmental record, delivered straight to your inbox.
Privacy policy

December 18, 2006
EPA Exempts Pesticides from Clean Water Act

November 17, 2006
EPA’s New Air Quality Standards Endanger Public Health

November 02, 2006
Bush Names Exxon Chief to Chart America’s Energy Future

See Articles By Category

Enter keyword(s) to search through back issues:

Mother Jones Feature
In the most recent issue of Mother Jones the growing consequences of pollution and environmental toxins for the region are highlighted in Dozens of Words for Snow, None for Pollution by Marla Cone. The article is free of charge to readers of BushGreenwatch.org.
 
Exxpose Exxon
A coalition of environmental and public interest groups spotlighting ExxonMobil’s efforts to drill in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, prevent action on global warming, and encourage America’s oil dependence.
 
Gristmill
Grist Magazine's new blog is the place for continuous commentary from a stable of smarty-pants writers the likes of which the environmental world has never seen.
 
REP America
View the website for the "environmental conscience of the GOP." This site includes the Campaign for Change: Action Plan for a Green GOP Century.
 
Environmental Health News
Sign up to receive daily news summaries of environmental health coverage from around the world, in your inbox by 9 am ET.


>E-mail this story
>Print this page
>Send BushGreenwatch to a friend

January 13, 2005 | Back Issues « previous | next »
Group Charges EPA Ignoring Health Dangers of Teflon

The release yesterday of an EPA draft risk assessment on PFOA -- a toxic chemical contained in Teflon -- has been sharply criticized by a leading environmental group, which charges the agency has ignored its own science panel's guidance and industry research.

The Environmental Working Group (EWG) pointed out that last March the EPA's Scientific Advisory Panel directed EPA to consider that several types of cancer are relevant to humans when assessing PFOA. But according to EWG, the EPA ignored the science panel's instructions for its risk assessment.

"There's a big difference between sound science and tilted science, and at every turn in this important process, EPA officials favored DuPont," said Ken Cook, president of EWG. "We don’t know if DuPont lobbyists played a role or if these were just agency mistakes. But for those who were expecting a thorough and fair review, this is a huge disappointment."

EWG noted that 24 hours prior to EPA's risk assessment release, a study by Dupont was released showing no effects associated with Teflon. EWG added that EPA also ignored several studies showing a risk of heart attack and stroke, plus its own guidelines for defining cancer potential, which normally require a chemical be considered carcinogenic when only one of five criteria is met. Teflon meets three of the five criteria. [1]

In past studies of Teflon conducted by both DuPont, Teflon's maker, and by 3M, scientists have uncovered links to cancer, evidence of immune system suppression and risk of heart attack and stroke.

After a year-long investigation by EPA, hearings began last month over allegations that DuPont was suppressing the health effects of Teflon. [2] Teflon is present in the bloodstream of 95% of Americans. EPA is investigating how this could happen.

"Compared to where the agency started on this subject, it's hard to see how EPA's new direction will lead it to protect the public from this chemical," Cook said.


###

SOURCES:
[1] EWG press release, Jan. 12, 2005.
[2] EWG statement, Dec. 17, 2004.





E-mail this story | Print this page | Send BushGreenwatch to a friend