Updates on the Bush Administration's environmental record, delivered straight to your inbox.
Privacy policy

December 18, 2006
EPA Exempts Pesticides from Clean Water Act

November 17, 2006
EPA’s New Air Quality Standards Endanger Public Health

November 02, 2006
Bush Names Exxon Chief to Chart America’s Energy Future

See Articles By Category

Enter keyword(s) to search through back issues:

Mother Jones Feature
In the most recent issue of Mother Jones the growing consequences of pollution and environmental toxins for the region are highlighted in Dozens of Words for Snow, None for Pollution by Marla Cone. The article is free of charge to readers of BushGreenwatch.org.
 
Exxpose Exxon
A coalition of environmental and public interest groups spotlighting ExxonMobil’s efforts to drill in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, prevent action on global warming, and encourage America’s oil dependence.
 
Gristmill
Grist Magazine's new blog is the place for continuous commentary from a stable of smarty-pants writers the likes of which the environmental world has never seen.
 
REP America
View the website for the "environmental conscience of the GOP." This site includes the Campaign for Change: Action Plan for a Green GOP Century.
 
Environmental Health News
Sign up to receive daily news summaries of environmental health coverage from around the world, in your inbox by 9 am ET.


>E-mail this story
>Print this page
>Send BushGreenwatch to a friend

August 16, 2005 | Back Issues « previous | next »
Republican House Members Support ANWR Protection

Last week 24 Republican lawmakers, including three committee
chairmen, signed a letter expressing their opposition to
including language in the budget reconciliation bill that would
allow for drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
(ANWR).

The letter, addressed to Resources Committee chairman Richard
Pombo (R-CA) and also sent to Speaker of the House, Dennis
Hastert (R-IL) and Budget Committee chairman Jim Nussle (R-IA)
states, "We believe that the reconciliation process is an
inappropriate venue to be debating this important environmental
issue." [1]

"We're happy that 24 members understand and know what a majority
of Americans feel, that the budget is the wrong place to include
provisions opening up ANWR," said Leslie Catherwood of the
Wilderness Society. [2]

The 19.6 million-acre ANWR sanctuary is home to a diverse array
of unique species, including caribou, polar bears, musk oxen,
arctic foxes, wolverines, grizzlies, and snow geese. [3]

Pointing out that the Refuge contains less oil than the United
States consumes in a year and will do nothing to reduce high gas
prices or the country's dependence on foreign oil,
environmentalists charge that drilling in the Refuge is not
worth the ecological devastation the development would incur.
[4]

The House has repeatedly passed measures to drill in the Refuge,
but all efforts have been filibustered and eventually defeated
in the Senate. The budget reconciliation document is not subject
to filibuster, and if signed by President Bush, it will become
law. This means House Democrats, who for the most part are opposed to
development in ANWR, must get a substantial number of
Republicans on board to successfully prevent drilling.

None of the 24 GOP lawmakers who signed the letter revealed
whether or not they would vote against the budget if an ANWR
provision were included. Among the signers were, Nancy Johnson
(CT), Sherwood Boehlert (NY), Chris Smith (NJ), James
Sensenbrenner (WI), Michael Castle (DE), Tim Johnson (IL).

###

SOURCES:
[1] Letter to House Chairman Richard Pombo, Aug. 4, 2005.
[2] "House GOP coalition wants ANWR stripped from budget," E&E
news PM, Aug. 10, 2005.
[3] Defenders of Wildife: Save the Arctic Refuge website.
[4] "GOP House Letter Sends Clear Signal Opposing Arctic Refuge
Drilling in Budget Reconciliation Bill," Aug. 12, 2005.





E-mail this story | Print this page | Send BushGreenwatch to a friend